sup Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 Uh oh, smokexorzz I have my first paid photo job tonight at 6:30. $10 an hour to shoot a school event, and I get free food Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 wtf f*g. no one likes the tuna here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 Why don't you try Fat Burger from now on? You can get yourself a cheese and fries for 2.95, f*ggot! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 KEKEKEKEKEKE. Anyway, back on topic. How long is that outing you're getting paid for supposed to last? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 3.5-4 hours. They want at least 75 shots, and there's gonna be 150 people there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
chris(pa) Posted January 26, 2008 Author Share Posted January 26, 2008 It's official No 5D replacement Now I have to wait till Photokina in Sept BOOOOOO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 26, 2008 Share Posted January 26, 2008 It's officialNo 5D replacement Now I have to wait till Photokina in Sept BOOOOOO I remember the CEO of Canon saying the whole EOS line will be updated in 2008. But normally, Canon usually updates the 1 series bodies every 3 years, and since the 5D was released in '05 and isn't in the consumer class (xxD, xxxD. updated usually every 18 months) it will most likely follow the 3 year update plan also. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airjordan223 Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Uh oh, smokexorzz I have my first paid photo job tonight at 6:30. $10 an hour to shoot a school event, and I get free food is that a hot wheel enzo in the background? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancy Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 i took this a while ago just to mess around with different speeds. this shot was cool because it was completely dark outside and it turned out pretty decent. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 is that a hot wheel enzo in the background? 575M Just got back from shooting, it was sooo awesome. Mostly scantily clad junior/senior girls. Chicks dig cameras. I could really do this for a living. Now to process all 180 photos. I'll post some as I do them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancy Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 575M Just got back from shooting, it was sooo awesome. Mostly scantily clad junior/senior girls. Chicks dig cameras. I could really do this for a living. Now to process all 180 photos. I'll post some as I do them. are you done processing yet? i wanna see. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kegger Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 She ain't the only one gary Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I'm about 1/3rd done. Here's some that I finished so far. I'll post more later. I'm surprised at how well my camera does at ISO 1600. But still, I needs a 5D. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kegger Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 They do look good but how can you claim they are done. All the girls in the second pic suffer from what appears to be red eye. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 They're not DONE done, I'm just setting the WB, brightness, and converting from RAW now. Then I'll put the ones I want to send through Photoshop and be really done. Red eye? Unheard of! It's my flash reflection I guess. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kegger Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Well my first guess was hyphema (blood inside the eye) But I didn't think all of them had been hit in the face with a baseball bat. So red eye was my second guess.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Here's two more, just for Kegan Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleanGSR Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 The third one in the first set (of 3), and the last two seem to be a tad underexposed on my monitor. You might try bumping the exposure a little on the raw file and see how that does. It's mainly because of the black everybody is wearing, but a slight bump might bring more detail in their suits. Also what, shutter speed were you using? Was it a hot shoe flash or built in? Were you in full manual. In full manual I would have kicked the shutter speed a little faster so the background would be about 1 stop less exposed than the subject to give them more pop. It looks the opposite, like the subject is about 1/2 - 1 stop less exposed than the background. Great pictures though, and always nice to get paid for shooting. Edit: One last thing....why were you shooting at ISO 1600 with flash. Flash is what exposes the subject and the camera will expose the background, so there would be no need to shoot at such a high ISO. You'd never see camera shake in the background exposure since it will be blurred from shooting f2.8. ISO 1600 only makes since if you are using built in flash instead of a hot shoe flash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Yeah they are kinda underexposed, it was hard to nail the exposures right because the lighting was basically the same to a church, plus it was at night so I wasn't getting any natural light through the windows to help. I shot high ISO with flash to keep the shutter speeds up while keeping my aperture around f/2 - f/2.8 for subject isolation, and it was in full manual. For most flash shots I kept the shutter speed around 1/200 - 1/100. I bounced all shots off the ceiling, just for a better light source than all the tungsten church-like lamps. Thanks for the advice though, this was really my first time shooting in such conditions, so next time I should know better of what to expect. More pics coming soon. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleanGSR Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Sounds like the lighting was pretty crappy and looks like really high ceilings to boot. Really good job though, especially for the bad conditions. Exposure is close, so you could easily fix it with raw editing. By the way, I really love the picture of the guy with the cigar. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Still converting stuff from RAW, I've been busy with math for the past 3 hours, and still have to read for philosophy and business ethics. Here's one more for now. Still needs more work. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Her expression to me is>"WAT" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sup Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 Yeah that threw the white balance off and brought out more noise Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted January 27, 2008 Share Posted January 27, 2008 I CAN DO PICTURE SHTUFFS! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleanGSR Posted January 28, 2008 Share Posted January 28, 2008 I changed the color balance and desaturated the red shirt in the background.Does this look any better/worse? Now that I look at it here, it looks too blue. :glare: No offense, but Sup's version looks much better. Did you use a gel on your flash (I never have, but heard they're helpful). What type of lighting was the ambient?, florescent or incandescent? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.