BolistiK_v6 Posted September 24, 2003 Share Posted September 24, 2003 I was thinking of getting an auto CL but i dont know if they are fast. Can they beat these cars stock for stock?? AUTO Acura 3.0 CL vs,.. 1) Auto 02 mustang v6 w00t 2) Manual 97 eklipse rs 3) Manual 01+ RSX 4) Manual 00+ Celica GT bleh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLontheDL Posted September 24, 2003 Share Posted September 24, 2003 1. no..well maybe? 2. no 3. hell no 4. dont waste your gas Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BolistiK_v6 Posted September 24, 2003 Author Share Posted September 24, 2003 1. no..well maybe?2. no 3. hell no 4. dont waste your gas 1) not sure of a no? why maybe? 4) dont waster your gas,.. as in i would lose real bad?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLontheDL Posted September 24, 2003 Share Posted September 24, 2003 1. yes, you MAY have a chance 4. you wont loose real bad but you may loose. any of those manual cars can loose a race against your car if they can't drive a stick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..SSR.. Posted September 24, 2003 Share Posted September 24, 2003 I was thinking of getting an auto CL but i dont know if they are fast. Can they beat these cars stock for stock?? AUTO Acura 3.0 CL vs,.. 1) Auto 02 mustang v6 w00t 2) Manual 97 eklipse rs 3) Manual 01+ RSX 4) Manual 00+ Celica GT bleh 1. What grade are you in? 2. What is your fetish with 02 automatic V6 Mustangs? 3. Eclipse. 4. If you want a fast car, don't buy an Acura except for an RSX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BolistiK_v6 Posted September 24, 2003 Author Share Posted September 24, 2003 rsx non type s arent fast at all. type s would cost too much. prolly go w/ s2000 for $20k. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
..SSR.. Posted September 24, 2003 Share Posted September 24, 2003 An S2000 is faster than an RSX but slower than an RSX-S. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optional187 Posted September 24, 2003 Share Posted September 24, 2003 1. the mustang will beat you 2. the eclipse would be a good race, but you'd still probably lose just because its manual. you guys do know that the rs eclipse' are as slow as non-vtec civic's right? 3. the rsx will beat you. 4. celica gt's also have civic like speed, and they top out at about 115mph. whether or not thats a speed limiter or not i'm not sure. and why are you thinking about racing a luxury car? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BolistiK_v6 Posted September 24, 2003 Author Share Posted September 24, 2003 3.0L is that a 4 banger or what? bleh Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLontheDL Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 3.0CL's are v6, aren't they? i know they have a 2.2, 2.3, and 3.0 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optional187 Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 3.0L = v6 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VR17 Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 3.0L is that a 4 banger or what? bleh thats a pretty big 4 cyl the CL dosent come in a 3.0L,its a 3.2L 225HP, or 260HP, it is an SOHC and its FWD.. and yes itsa V6. in my opinion, i think its better compared to 04 Volvo C70, 04 BMW 325 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddySol Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 Actually...there was a 3.0 CL...the first gen, which was basically a re-skinned Accord Coupe. The 3.0 was a 200hp V6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLontheDL Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 frankies correct, for once. the 1st gen came in 2.2, 2.3, and 3.0. its the 2nd gen that ONLY come in 3.2 the CL-S is the 260 hp with a manual transmission. its too bad the 03 CL will be the last year of the CL era. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
optional187 Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 in my opinion, i think its better compared to 04 Volvo C70, 04 BMW 325 the new bmw's are some of the nicest design's that bmw has put out in my opinion. except for the new m3 design...which, imo, looks too big. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BuddySol Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 frankies correct, for once. the 1st gen came in 2.2, 2.3, and 3.0. its the 2nd gen that ONLY come in 3.2 the CL-S is the 260 hp with a manual transmission. its too bad the 03 CL will be the last year of the CL era. For once? :( Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
VR17 Posted September 25, 2003 Share Posted September 25, 2003 its too bad the 03 CL will be the last year of the CL era. i think its because of production sales Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
TLontheDL Posted September 26, 2003 Share Posted September 26, 2003 frankies correct, for once. the 1st gen came in 2.2, 2.3, and 3.0. its the 2nd gen that ONLY come in 3.2 the CL-S is the 260 hp with a manual transmission. its too bad the 03 CL will be the last year of the CL era. For once? :( lol nah it was suppose to be a joke.. ken: yeah it is the production sale. i do see more TL's than CL's but most TL owners are old foggies.. you dont see too many hooked up TL's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jermz123 Posted January 29, 2004 Share Posted January 29, 2004 1.itll be close but no 2. yes. rs's are crap 3. NO 4.NO Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.