HotSauceH22 Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 grudge raced my buddys mustang i ran a 15.37 @ 91.68 he ran a 15.11 @ 90.34 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeryon Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 The driver of the stang must not know how to drive. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 15's in a GT is pathetic unless it's a 94/95 Vert. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Bad9D8 Posted April 14, 2009 Share Posted April 14, 2009 The driver of the stang must not know how to drive. no the driver in the stang does know how to drive 15's in a GT is pathetic unless it's a 94/95 Vert. 15's is not pathetic it is the non pi motor and only makes 235 hp stock its the weakest 4.6. when it has the head swap done and cams installed it will have 340 hp and be in 13's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotSauceH22 Posted April 15, 2009 Author Share Posted April 15, 2009 nobody commend me for my nice run or anything, lol maybe the mustang seems slow because its decepted by the quick prelude, haha Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Bad9D8 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 nobody commend me for my nice run or anything, lol maybe the mustang seems slow because its decepted by the quick prelude, haha lol they dont care about your car the only reason they some on here it to compete and argue to see whos piece of crap is better Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
wannaBstuntin Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 lol they dont care about your car the only reason they some on here it to compete and argue to see whos piece of crap is better Lol, they don't care about your car. The only reason they come on here is to compete and argue to see who's piece of crap is better. That is an inaccurate assessment. I come here to correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 no the driver in the stang does know how to drive 15's is not pathetic it is the non pi motor and only makes 235 hp stock its the weakest 4.6. when it has the head swap done and cams installed it will have 340 hp and be in 13's Even a poorly driven 96/98 4.6 can bang out 14's consistently unless it's dogged the f*ck out and has high mileage. He's not that high above sea level. And LOL @ a pi swap netting a 96/04 GT that much power. Must be flywheel or crank numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Repsol Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 and the mustang beats the civic! or accord. . . LMAO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CleanGSR Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 and the mustang beats the civic! or accord. . . LMAO. Point is though, that he announced that the Mustang won......so why is it that anybody would commend the OP for a nice run. You got beat. I thought that preludes were quicker than that. If you are bone stock I guess that's pretty good. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeryon Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 For some reason I thought he was running an auto too. Win or lose, any day at the track is a good day. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Bad9D8 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 Even a poorly driven 96/98 4.6 can bang out 14's consistently unless it's dogged the f*ck out and has high mileage. He's not that high above sea level. if i ran the hell out of my car then i could hit 14's but i need it to drive every day i wasnt launching hard and was shifting at 5300 not running it to redline which is 6. a 98 cobra only runs 14.50's stock that is crank numbers. and i said pi swap and stage 2 cams Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Xeryon Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I guess I am just used to mustangs running 12's. I have a coupe friends with stangs but none are stock so I was not aware they were that slow. I owned a 99 prelude for 2 years and just never thought of it as being as fast as a mustang gt regardless of the year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
h23vtc95accrd Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 The driver of either car doesnt know how to drive Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 if i ran the hell out of my car then i could hit 14's but i need it to drive every day i wasnt launching hard and was shifting at 5300 not running it to redline which is 6. a 98 cobra only runs 14.50's stock that is crank numbers. and i said pi swap and stage 2 cams I don't see WHERE you're getting your information from. VT Stage 2 cams with a port/polish job on a friend of mine's 04 GT only got him about 296 at the wheels. SAE corrected and all. And they've got some fairly hefty lobes. And where in the SH*T do you get your quarter mile times from? 96/98 Cobra's have been found as low as high 13's in stock trim. Great God almighty it hurts to talk to misinformed people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Bad9D8 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I don't see WHERE you're getting your information from. VT Stage 2 cams with a port/polish job on a friend of mine's 04 GT only got him about 296 at the wheels. SAE corrected and all. And they've got some fairly hefty lobes. And where in the SH*T do you get your quarter mile times from? 96/98 Cobra's have been found as low as high 13's in stock trim. Great God almighty it hurts to talk to misinformed people. head swap on non pi block creates more compression they will add maybe 50 hp and hitech stage 2 cams add 50 or so so i have 240 to crank + the 100 between those two and ill have over 300 hp to crank. idk what your friend has my dad has hitech cams and he has over 300 hp. and the 96-98 cobras probably barely hit thirteens stock they have 260 hp which is roughly the same as the 01-04 stock whick run 14.00's Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Bad9D8 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 I guess I am just used to mustangs running 12's. I have a coupe friends with stangs but none are stock so I was not aware they were that slow. I owned a 99 prelude for 2 years and just never thought of it as being as fast as a mustang gt regardless of the year. yeah im a 17 year old senior in high school its my daily driver so its pretty much stock for now. when i do the heads cams and a bottle it will be in 12's. my dads and three of my friends have 11/12 second mustangs lol i feel really slow ridin with them. and the preludes are quick too dont forget that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Bad9D8 Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 heres a car with just bolt ons and hitech cams about 300rwhp runnin 12.16 1/4 mile Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 head swap on non pi block creates more compression they will add maybe 50 hp and hitech stage 2 cams add 50 or so so i have 240 to crank + the 100 between those two and ill have over 300 hp to crank. idk what your friend has my dad has hitech cams and he has over 300 hp. and the 96-98 cobras probably barely hit thirteens stock they have 260 hp which is roughly the same as the 01-04 stock whick run 14.00's Uh..4v numbers are vastly superior to 2v numbers, dude. They were rated 305 at the flywheel or crank and didn't have much parastic loss through the transmission. 2v's only dyno 230's or 240's to the rear wheel if I'm not mistaken. 96+ Cobra's/4v Mach1's have been competition SOMEWHAT(keyword here being SOMEWHAT, as bolt on LSx F-bodies don't bullcrap whatsoever) for LSx F-bodies but, considering they discontinued such.. And in the not-so-great state of Florida I've seen VERY good drivers take a New Edge GT, low mileage of course; and whore it out to a 13.9 pass, at a little over 100mph. Guess the air be thicker up there or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted April 15, 2009 Share Posted April 15, 2009 LOL IS THAT VIDEO TREVOR'S GT? Edit -- Yea..seen him on some message boards. He's dyno'd 300/309. Which isn't bad. Drew may have just had piss poor headwork done on his car, he only dyno'd a few shy of Trevor's crap. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotSauceH22 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 The driver of either car doesnt know how to drive lol Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotSauceH22 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Point is though, that he announced that the Mustang won......so why is it that anybody would commend the OP for a nice run. You got beat. I thought that preludes were quicker than that. If you are bone stock I guess that's pretty good. LOL! you guys are funny Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
HotSauceH22 Posted April 16, 2009 Author Share Posted April 16, 2009 Preludes pwn noobs f150s, crxs, and civics............ do not pwn noobs Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
1Bad9D8 Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 yeah its trevors car Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben. Posted April 16, 2009 Share Posted April 16, 2009 Preludes pwn noobs f150s, crxs, and civics............ do not pwn noobs Unfortunately..among this group..you're the only noobass here so.. Gee, wondering how that works.. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.