keffreg Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 what would be the best vs a AWD talon turbo honda/acura ONLY! any suggestions I have a good amount of my sign on bonus left and need help desiding i think AWD talon is what i wana beat any suggestions would be great !
Hatch92 Posted December 18, 2006 Posted December 18, 2006 your best bet would to buy what you want. i've seen a '94 civic hatch smoke a '96 gsx at the track both daily drivers. i've also seen a '98 civic coupe run door to door with a '94 TSi awd. it's all in the way you want to build it and what you want out of it. Edit: if you want a car that is decently fast stock go with the talon/eclipse awd.
mycarsux Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 or not.. SRT-4s are not allowed on HF. BAHAHAHAHAHAHA..pwned Honda > DSM but... SRT-4 > Honda ..there I said it, lynch me why don't you.
Pballer2005 Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 are srt-4's as unreliable as the rest of chrylser's cars? cuz if they are as reliable as honda, then yes i would have to agree that srt4>honda
mycarsux Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 The unreliability of the SRT-4 does NOT outweigh how awesome it is. Sadly, this is not the case in DSM's.
90IntegraC1 Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 I'm gonna buy a SRT-4 just to piss everyone off. They're not unreliable, and my dad's Chrysler 300M has 95,000 miles on it and hasn't had any problems...so i don't know what some of you people are talking about.
Pyrorocketeer Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 The unreliability of the SRT-4 does NOT outweigh how awesome it is. Sadly, this is not the case in DSM's. is everyone here still stuck on the crankwalk thing? It isn't as big of a problem with DSM's as you all make it out to be.....
mycarsux Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 is everyone here still stuck on the crankwalk thing? It isn't as big of a problem with DSM's as you all make it out to be..... DSM's have a lot more problems than crankwalk. Crankwalk, though not the most common one, is just definatley the most threatening to a motor. 95-99 GSX/Tsi AWD's had a transfer case recall too.
CleanGSR Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 I'm gonna buy a SRT-4 just to piss everyone off. They're not unreliable, and my dad's Chrysler 300M has 95,000 miles on it and hasn't had any problems...so i don't know what some of you people are talking about. I'm talking about my two uncles who are both mechanics and say that they see Chryslers WAY more than any other brand of cars and that they always have more problems with them. Same thing from my mechanic that we've gone to local for the past 20 years. I'm also talking about the guy we saw a couple years ago who had his brand new van (purchased that day) towed back into the Chrysler delaer after breaking down on his 200 mile trip home. I'm talking about my grandparents who have chrysler's and have had problems with them from the first day they bought them. The bought them because they were cheap and they got what they paid for. All that said, I think that Chrysler now is better than the one 5 or 10 years ago and are slowly getting better since Mercedes entered the picture, but I still wouldn't trust them farther than I could throw the heavy piles of poo.
mycarsux Posted December 19, 2006 Posted December 19, 2006 How far can you throw heavy piles of poo? And how does that relate to trust?
Pballer2005 Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 my gf's family has had chrylsers all their lives till just now. i know i've said this b4 but the only good one they's had is a dodge pickup with a cummins deisel. now they have toyotas.
Kastigir Posted December 20, 2006 Posted December 20, 2006 is everyone here still stuck on the crankwalk thing? It isn't as big of a problem with DSM's as you all make it out to be..... It is with mine, and will be the reason I NEVER buy another Chrysler or Mitsubishi product. Not even their damn TVs.
lsvtec90teg Posted December 25, 2006 Posted December 25, 2006 91 awd turbo talon tsi is the way to go stock they run 14.3's if it isnt raped but then intake, innercooler, 3'' exhaust, maf translator, gm mafsensor, and a boost contoller and ur in the 13's. then big turbo and manifold, fuel pump, injectors etc. way faster than a honda i just sold mine and i never got beat by nothing and there is no crankwalk in the 1gs stay in the 90-92 range srt4s are over rated and a waste of money
Ben. Posted December 25, 2006 Posted December 25, 2006 i've seen too many srt4's blow out their clutches and crap with little or no modification made to them. i'd hate to see what one that's modified with an amateur driver would do. Guess that's why they're roll racers.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.