CherylJoan Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 It is very simple question, why did not they utilize the 2.0L engine previously used in the basic Civic, turbo'd. What things are good does it do to append turbo but then decrease the engine? The entire point of the Si is wonderful performance! Did Honda withhold on this to try to keep some bucks on the Civic engine to make the most of profits? Or possibly it is some other reason. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Aggressor5 Posted April 25, 2017 Share Posted April 25, 2017 Honda has done this to comply with U.S. emission laws. The 1.5 liter turbo is an absolutely fantastic engine with more than enough power. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CherylJoan Posted April 26, 2017 Author Share Posted April 26, 2017 Hello friend, Yes, i am agree with you that 1.5 liter turbo is really fantastic engine. But my question is that why we are not going with 2.0L instead of 1.5L? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
CherylJoan Posted April 27, 2017 Author Share Posted April 27, 2017 It was really a wonderful experience to post here. Even i am regular member of http://www.autozin.com/for-sale/k20-honda, and here i am getting everything that i want for my knowledge. But this forum really make an impression. I will be regular here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.