Boostedgt6 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 im buying a new car and i can pick up a 2000 prelude sh for 10,000 with aem intake headers and exhaust and skunk 2 coilovers with 78,000 miles or i can get a bone stock type-s with 22 thousand miles for 18,000 price range is a big difference but is the rsx that much better than the prelude?? i dont know i need help Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nancy Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 id go for the rsx, epecially if its completely stock. besides the k20 is better than the h22 imo. the only thing i dislike about the rsx in the non-double wish bone suspension, kinda a step back i think. be careful buying a car thats already modded, you never know. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
airjordan223 Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 of those two id get the rsx. but you could get a 350 Z for the same price Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostedgt6 Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 yea i know what your sayin about cars already done up...and im tryin to stick with a honda/acura i already have a mazda and it eats sti's and evo's like nothin i jus want a newer car that looks good, has a little bit of power and good gas mileage!! cuz gas price's in CT are no joke Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
cranny Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 to me , thats a no brainer , rsx all the way. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velocifero Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 to me , thats a no brainer , rsx all the way. i dunno, those preludes are rarer, at least in my town. and with the money you spend on the RSX could easily make the prelude faster. i think it looks better too, less like a chick car. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AccordHEART Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 I would go with the lude. I'm not much on the RSX. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Matteu Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 K motor has a superior design, more rugged. K motor is newer and does not have the years of refinement a B series or H series motor has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Velocifero Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 K motor has a superior design, more rugged. K motor is newer and does not have the years of refinement a B series or H series motor has. right, but its also 8k more. if their prices were the same id pick the rsx. you could get a k swap for less than 8k..a good one too like k24 block with k20 head. but that isnt worth the price either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveJDM Posted October 2, 2007 Share Posted October 2, 2007 i wouldnt get niether car they both ugly =)~ <3 integra+hatchbacks FTW the fact is go with what YOU like not what others like <3 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Boostedgt6 Posted October 2, 2007 Author Share Posted October 2, 2007 yea i got a integra now and im selling it.. its a 1990 with a 98 ls full exhaust cai full 93 gsr interior (yep leather seats that i didnt have to ghetto hack to make them fit) everything msd that you can think of with spoon rims all it needs is a paint job badd Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ILoveJDM Posted October 3, 2007 Share Posted October 3, 2007 i had a 91 black but i blew the motor and sold the shell for only $350.00! i wish i woulda kept it for project car but its ok i got a 99 ls now and i plan on doing lots of work to the motor wen the time/money is right Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.